College & Research Libraries News
A student assistant program for the Nineties
By F. Jay Fuller
Night Supervisor
California State University, Chico
Today’s academic libraries employ a great variety of people with different levels of education, expertise, and experience. Administrators, librarians, clerical, and paraprofessional staff each play a vital role in maintaining the library as the academic center for information storage and retrieval. However, some core library functions such as circulation, discharge, shelving, and even light bibliographical work are handled by individuals with little or no training in library work when they began their employment. Included in this category are student assistant employees.
One innovative student assistant program that might serve as a model for other libraries is found at the Meriam Library, California State University, Chico.
Our original student assistant program was structured so that each individual department hired and trained its own employees. When the library was relatively small and the number of student employees few, this system sufficed and ran quite well. However, we found that this compartmentalized system perpetuated significant inconsistencies in student employee training, discipline and evaluation, and developed a series of inescapable flaws as the library’s collections became larger and more diversified, and the machinery to care for these collections became more complex. It also proved to be unwieldy when budget restrictions caused the number of full-time staff to decrease and the size of the student work force to increase to compensate for the loss. And there existed a distinct lack of flexibility in the movement of personnel from one department in the library to another. If a student employee wished or was needed to move to another department, that person literally had to quit, reapply to the library for a job with the other department, and be rehired.
In 1968 the library made a decision to move from this fragmented system to one that was centralized. The Department of Student Personnel was established to handle all student personnel transactions throughout the employment process. Two staff people, the manager of student personnel and the night supervisor, currently run the program, which employs 240 students. These two individuals are also in charge of the library’s physical plant.
This restructuring of student employment has rectified a number of inconsistencies and solved countless problems. First, it frees the staff in technical and public service departments from the responsibility of keeping up with developments concerning the employment of student assistants. Changes in university policy, tax laws, hiring practices, wage scales and increases, etc., that involve student employees are handled by one office, and the staff in technical and public service areas can concentrate on the vital work of their units.
Second, it ensures that the hiring, training, performance expectations and evaluations of student employees are standardized and uniformly implemented. A manual was written (and is constantly updated) that outlines the basics for every student employee. All new students know what is expected of them and by what criteria they will be evaluated.
Third, it allows flexibility in using the student work force through the central referral of needs. The work force can be easily manipulated so that shortages, overloads, changes in priorities, or special projects can be dealt with efficiently by moving personnel where they are needed most, without red tape or delay.
Fourth, it guarantees that student employees are treated fairly within the employment structure. All student employees are under the authority of a central office that is directly responsible for their welfare and provides a built-in grievance system to ensure that students’ complaints or problems are heard, and that any action taken by the library is consistent.
Interview and hiring procedures for potential student employees are the same, whether the individual is going to be funded by Federal Work Study or State Student Assistant monies. The manager of student personnel and the night supervisor interview and rank candidates for each type of funding, taking special note of any skills the individuals have indicated on the employment application. Those few who have word processing or typing skills are directed to further interviews with the department heads of public service units. A smaller number with other skills or expertise (carpentry, electronics, computer programming, etc.) are directed to the supervisors of any of our numerous technical service units. The majority of others who rate highly, but have limited or no specific skills, are routed to the stacking unit. Provided that interviews with unit supervisors go well, students then return to the manager of student personnel’s office to fill out the necessary paperwork for university employment. Individuals who rate less highly are placed on a waiting list, forming a ready pool of students in case of student employee shortages during the academic year.
Student employees are used extensively in the public service areas. Depending on the specific needs of the department, student employees may find themselves doing jobs that, in libraries lacking effective student training programs, are often filled by full-time staff. Some copy cataloging, bibliographic verification, occasional billing, and fine collection are carried out by students. Each student, especially in circulation, must become familiar with and be able to use the library’s computer system to perform a variety of tasks. They must be able to compile a new patron record, update an old record, make hold and call requests, search for title, author, call number or item requests, as well as work the desk and do routine check-outs and check-ins.
Student employees are also an important element in the technical areas of the Meriam Library’s computer system operation. They are responsible for starting and shutting down the computer system, preparing the system for the next day’s operation, running reports and maintenance programs, doing some onsite trouble-shooting, system upgrading, and minor terminal repair. They must also maintain, service, and trouble-shoot the library’s microfiche and microform machines, as well as the videodisk-based “Infotrac” computers and CD-based indexes.
As noted above, training for the majority of the student employees begins in the stacking unit where they learn the Library of Congress call number system and the locations of the library’s myriad collections. This familiarizes new student employees with different collections and how they relate to one another, gives them a sense of the building’s physical layout, and prepares them for directing patrons in search of materials. The library considers that offering this wide range of employment is a significant contribution to the students’ overall education.
As with any system, problems are sometimes encountered and our library’s student assistant program is constantly being scrutinized, modified and renovated to deal with these difficulties. The number one problem is the high turnover rate of the work force. Minimum wage ($3.35) is the starting pay for the majority of workers. Some inevitably think this wage is inadequate compensation for their efforts and abandon their jobs. Others find the job monotonous, the hours difficult given their class loads, or have not sufficiently developed their work habits to be reliable employees. Another problem is the tendency for student employees to take vacations from work at the same time as they take vacations from their classes. This occasionally leaves the library critically short of help during the summer months and over the winter holidays— times when the library’s collections are shelf-read, shifted, and generally prepared for the next semester, and when large special projects are done, such as recarpeting, stack building and furniture rearrangement.
In order to combat these problems, we implemented a pay scale that rewards those who maintain a solid work schedule and receive a good evaluation each semester. Good work attendance, punctuality, consistent performance on the job, tact when dealing with patrons, and the ability to handle criticism and follow directions, are all rated on each evaluation. Since pay raises are not based on the duration of one’s employment (there are no automatic raises), but on individual performance, most student assistants take their jobs seriously. Personnel shortages during vacation periods have been dealt with by treating semester breaks and the summer months as if those times were additional semesters. This gives student employees with poor evaluations a chance to improve them by upgrading their skills and work performance, and gives those with good evaluations a means to move up the pay scale more quickly, provided their evaluations remain strong. Added incentive is generated by the student supervisor program, which gives a select number of outstanding student workers more responsibility, greater flexibility of action, and significantly higher pay. Starting at $4.45 per hour, an individual in this program, with good evaluations, can quickly move up the scale and peak at $7.20 per hour, currently the top wage permitted a student assistant employee on a California State University campus.
The student supervisor is the linchpin of our student assistant program. It was developed to promote leadership and responsibility. Student assistants in this program are chiefly responsible for training new student workers, monitoring worker attendance and performance, pay voucher verification, scheduling work assignments and carrying out emergency procedures. Often these students work independently of direct staff supervision, and have the latitude to use their own initiative and resourcefulness to get the job done.
This has proven especially effective where student talents and enthusiasm in relation to academic majors have been applied to library work. Engineering majors have given their coursework life by constructing machines to keep the library’s shelving intact during recarpeting. In the past two years this has involved moving approximately 400,000 volumes and attendant shelving. All the work has been done by student crews, and all the collections affected have remained completely accessible during the recarpeting process. Interior design majors have renovated existing Meriam Library furniture, applying their carpentry skills to make obsolete nonprint media carrels for new equipment. Mathematics majors have had opportunities to do statistical work and to develop theoretical models for book flow and shelving distribution. Computer majors have been able to work with the library’s mini-computer and gain experience with some of the latest technology. Liberal studies majors have used their skills to write a computerized training program series that takes student trainees through the various call number systems (Library of Congress, Dewey Decimal, etc.), instructs them in the intricacies of shelving, and tests their knowledge. Many veterans of this program, including myself, have either gone on to attend library school or have been recruited to fill paraprofessional or clerical positions with the Meriam Library.
In all, our experience has shown that student employees are not only a major part of this university library’s operation, but a vital—even essential—part of the library’s commitment to make information readily available to patrons. It shows that these students, like our other library employees, are capable and responsible individuals, willing and enthusiastic colleagues, worthy of our praise in recognition of their efforts, and one of the most effective and productive uses of our library personnel budget.
Article Views (By Year/Month)
| 2026 |
| January: 8 |
| 2025 |
| January: 16 |
| February: 18 |
| March: 25 |
| April: 32 |
| May: 22 |
| June: 33 |
| July: 17 |
| August: 25 |
| September: 26 |
| October: 18 |
| November: 36 |
| December: 27 |
| 2024 |
| January: 7 |
| February: 11 |
| March: 24 |
| April: 23 |
| May: 12 |
| June: 10 |
| July: 6 |
| August: 23 |
| September: 17 |
| October: 18 |
| November: 19 |
| December: 17 |
| 2023 |
| January: 22 |
| February: 12 |
| March: 13 |
| April: 52 |
| May: 22 |
| June: 3 |
| July: 2 |
| August: 2 |
| September: 5 |
| October: 2 |
| November: 13 |
| December: 3 |
| 2022 |
| January: 1 |
| February: 4 |
| March: 5 |
| April: 4 |
| May: 6 |
| June: 2 |
| July: 9 |
| August: 5 |
| September: 8 |
| October: 38 |
| November: 11 |
| December: 2 |
| 2021 |
| January: 2 |
| February: 6 |
| March: 4 |
| April: 9 |
| May: 1 |
| June: 4 |
| July: 2 |
| August: 1 |
| September: 8 |
| October: 8 |
| November: 3 |
| December: 6 |
| 2020 |
| January: 0 |
| February: 6 |
| March: 27 |
| April: 4 |
| May: 3 |
| June: 4 |
| July: 3 |
| August: 0 |
| September: 13 |
| October: 9 |
| November: 9 |
| December: 6 |