Rethinking CRAAP: Getting students thinking like fact-checkers in evaluating web sources

Jennifer A. Fielding


For over two decades, librarians have been at the forefront of helping their patrons and students discern what online information is reliable, and what may be biased or outright false. Particularly as more formal information literacy programs developed at the college and university level (and the attendant inclusion of information literacy in many general education programs), academic librarians have developed curricula and taught students how to evaluate web sources for credibility. In many institutions, this has frequently been achieved via a “one-shot” session with a checklist of sorts, often some variation of the CRAAP Method (Currency, Reliability, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose) developed nearly 15 years ago at California State University-Chico.

Full Text:

Copyright Jennifer A. Fielding

Article Views (Last 12 Months)

No data available

Contact ACRL for article usage statistics from 2010-April 2017.

Article Views (By Year/Month)

January: 102
February: 191
March: 259
April: 147
May: 183
June: 105
July: 91
January: 533
February: 520
March: 272
April: 284
May: 148
June: 137
July: 122
August: 123
September: 137
October: 160
November: 150
December: 91
January: 0
February: 0
March: 0
April: 0
May: 0
June: 0
July: 0
August: 0
September: 0
October: 0
November: 0
December: 1731